Andreas Bletschacher - The Future of SPS Dispute Settlement at the World Trade Organization

EC-Biotech and US-Continued Suspension as Examples for the Proceduralization of SPS Issues

96,80 €
96,80 €
inkl. MwSt.
zzgl. Versandkosten

Lieferzeit max. 4 Tage *

Die Menge muss 1 oder mehr sein

Lieferung & Versand

  • Warensendung bis 500 g
    0,00 €
    Lieferzeit max. 4 Tage

Über das Buch

– in englischer Sprache –

Zum Inhalt

First, the book aims to develop a theory of what the status of the WTO is and how it has developed so far.

Starting with a short description of the old GATT system, the first chapter introduces the reader to the multilateral trading system. The chapter provides an overview of the Dispute Settlement Mechanism and explain the new Dispute Settlement Understanding, established in the Uruguay Round.

Chapter II examines the health-related provisions of the GATT and shows why there was the necessity to develop more specific agreements in the course of the Uruguay Round. Conflicts existed in the area of food safety, animal and plant health already before the establishment of the WTO. These concerns were addressed in Art. XX (b) GATT 1947. However, since this Article was kept too general, WTO members created the SPS Agreement. Both agreements are relevant to measures for the protection of human, animal and plant health; therefore, it is necessary to examine the relationship between the SPS Agreement and GATT 1994.

Chapter III compares the two approaches. This chapter also introduces the reader to essential elements and regulations of the SPS Agreement, highlighted with decisions from older cases of SPS history. The basic principles of the SPS Agreement reflect the underlying goal of addressing the crucial need to open the market for food and agricultural products. The importance of this agreement is already high but will even increase in the future. With further cuts in tariffs, member countries will increasingly seek non-tariff measures to protect their own domestic markets. It is more challenging for member countries to eliminate regulatory barriers to trade than to reduce tariffs. Many regulations are legitimate and consider purposes not related to trade, whereas others may be designed for discriminatory purposes, to protect the domestic industry from the effects of globalization or to achieve other competitive advantages in…

Schlagworte

World Trade Organization, GMO‘s, International Trade, SPS Dispute Settlement, US-Continued Suspesion, EC-Biotech, Welthandelsorganisation, Sanitäre Handelshemmnisse, Internationales Recht, Agrarpolitik, Ernährungspolitik, Internationale Beziehungen

  • Autor*in
    Andreas Bletschacher
  • Seiten
    266
  • Zusatzinfos
    – in englischer Sprache –
  • Jahr
    Hamburg 2016
  • ISBN
    978-3-8300-8991-9
  • Fachdisziplin
    Staatsrecht, Verfassungsrecht & Völkerrecht
  • Schriftenreihe
    Studien zum Völker- und Europarecht
  • ISSN
    1613-0979
  • Band
    139
  • Fachbereich
    Jura

Lieferzeit

(*) Die Lieferzeit beträgt innerhalb Deutschlands üblicherweise 2 bis 3 Werktage ab Zahlungseingang. Bei Bestellungen an Wochenenden und Feiertagen verzögert sich die Auslieferung entsprechend.